Question 1

What qualifies as a trade secret under the law?

Accepted Answer

Trade secrets are information that derives economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable, and is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. This can include formulas, processes, customer lists, business strategies, pricing information, and software algorithms. Key factors in protection include whether the information provides competitive advantage, whether it's known only to those who need it, and whether reasonable measures (confidentiality agreements, access controls, security measures) are in place. Unlike patents or copyrights, trade secret protection requires ongoing secrecy—once publicly disclosed, protection is lost.

Question 2

What should I do if an employee leaves to work for a competitor?

Accepted Answer

Act promptly when employees with access to sensitive information join competitors. Immediately review any agreements with the employee including non-disclosure, non-compete, and invention assignment provisions. Conduct an exit interview addressing confidentiality obligations and collect all company property and data. Review access logs to identify any unusual downloading or copying before departure. If you suspect misappropriation, preserve evidence and consult counsel about sending a cease and desist letter, seeking a temporary restraining order, or initiating litigation. Document everything. Delay can result in irreparable harm and weakened legal position.

Question 3

What remedies are available for trade secret misappropriation?

Accepted Answer

The Defend Trade Secrets Act and state laws provide robust remedies. Injunctive relief can prevent ongoing or threatened use of misappropriated secrets. Damages may include actual losses, unjust enrichment, and reasonable royalties. In cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, courts may award exemplary damages up to double the actual damages plus attorney's fees. Seizure orders allow recovery of misappropriated materials in extraordinary circumstances. Remedies may also include return or destruction of materials containing trade secrets. The combination of injunctive relief and damages makes trade secret protection a powerful tool when secrets are taken.

Question 4

How do I prove trade secret misappropriation?

Accepted Answer

Proving misappropriation requires showing you possessed a valid trade secret, the defendant acquired it through improper means or breach of a confidential relationship, and the defendant used or disclosed the information. Circumstantial evidence often plays a key role since direct evidence of theft is rare. Common evidence includes timing of defendant's actions relative to access to secrets, departure of employees with relevant knowledge, similarity between defendant's products or methods and the trade secret, and impossible speed of defendant's development. Forensic analysis of computers and electronic communications frequently reveals critical evidence. Preservation and collection of evidence immediately upon suspecting misappropriation is essential.

Question 5

What protections should businesses implement to safeguard intellectual property?

Accepted Answer

Comprehensive IP protection requires multiple layers. For trade secrets: identify and document confidential information, limit access on a need-to-know basis, use confidentiality agreements with employees and business partners, implement physical and electronic security measures, and conduct exit procedures for departing employees. For other IP: register trademarks and patents where appropriate, use proper copyright notices, monitor for infringement, and enforce rights consistently. Employee agreements should address invention assignment, non-disclosure, and where enforceable, non-competition. Regular training reminds employees of obligations. These measures both protect assets and strengthen legal claims if disputes arise.

Question 6

Are non-compete agreements enforceable?

Accepted Answer

Non-compete enforceability varies significantly by state. Some states like California largely prohibit employee non-competes, while others enforce reasonable restrictions. Factors courts consider include geographic scope, duration, scope of restricted activities, whether the restriction is necessary to protect legitimate interests, and whether adequate consideration was provided. Courts often modify overly broad restrictions rather than invalidating them entirely. The FTC has proposed rules that would largely ban employee non-competes, though legal challenges are expected. Given uncertainty, consider layered protection through non-disclosure agreements, non-solicitation provisions, and trade secret protections that don't depend on non-compete enforcement.

Question 7

How should I respond if accused of infringing another's intellectual property?

Accepted Answer

Take accusations seriously even if you believe they're unfounded. Immediately preserve all relevant documents and communications. Do not destroy anything potentially relevant to the dispute. Consult experienced IP counsel to evaluate the claims, your potential defenses, and litigation risk. Consider whether continuing the accused activity is worth the risk while the dispute is pending. Review insurance policies for potential coverage. Investigate whether you have prior rights, independent development defenses, or invalidity arguments. Early case assessment helps make informed decisions about settlement versus litigation. A measured, strategic response positions you for the best outcome.

Intellectual Property Disputes and Trade Secrets

Frequently Asked Questions

Disclaimer:

Need Legal Assistance?