Question 1

What is the difference between libel and slander?

Accepted Answer

Both are forms of defamation—false statements harming someone's reputation. Libel refers to written or published defamatory statements, including those in newspapers, books, online posts, and broadcast media. Slander refers to spoken defamatory statements. The distinction affects legal requirements in some jurisdictions: libel is often presumed harmful, while slander may require proof of actual damages unless it falls into 'slander per se' categories (statements about crimes, disease, professional unfitness, or sexual misconduct). With digital communications, the line has blurred as statements may be both written and ephemeral. The key element in both is a false statement of fact that harms reputation.

Question 2

What must I prove to win a defamation case?

Accepted Answer

Defamation claims require proving a false statement of fact (not opinion) published to third parties, that is 'of and concerning' the plaintiff, with the requisite level of fault, causing damages. Public figures must prove 'actual malice'—knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth—while private figures typically must prove negligence. The statement must be provably false; opinions, hyperbole, and vague insults are often protected. Publication means communication to anyone other than the plaintiff. Damages may be presumed for certain statements or must be proven with evidence of actual harm. Defenses include truth, opinion, privilege, and fair report.

Question 3

How can I protect my business reputation online?

Accepted Answer

Proactive online reputation management includes monitoring online mentions using alerts and monitoring services, developing positive content to dominate search results, engaging constructively with legitimate criticism, responding promptly and professionally to negative reviews, and building relationships with customers who provide positive feedback. When facing false statements, options include requesting removal from platforms (many have policies against false content), responding with accurate information, pursuing legal action for clear defamation, and working with reputation management services for persistent problems. Document all false statements and their impact. Prevention through excellent customer service and quality products remains the best protection.

Question 4

What are the defenses to defamation claims?

Accepted Answer

Truth is the most complete defense—true statements cannot be defamatory regardless of harm caused. Opinion statements that cannot be proven true or false are protected, though stated or implied facts underlying opinions are not. Various privileges protect certain statements: absolute privilege for statements in judicial proceedings and legislative debate, qualified privilege for good faith statements on matters of common interest, and fair report privilege for accurate reporting of official proceedings. First Amendment protections apply to statements about public officials and public figures on matters of public concern, requiring proof of actual malice.

Question 5

What damages can I recover in a defamation case?

Accepted Answer

Defamation damages may include compensatory damages for actual harm—lost business, lost employment, medical expenses for emotional distress, and quantifiable reputation injury. Presumed damages may be available for libel and slander per se without proof of actual harm. Special damages cover specific economic losses causally connected to the defamation. In cases of actual malice or egregious conduct, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the defendant. Courts also may issue injunctions requiring removal of defamatory statements, though prior restraint of speech raises First Amendment concerns. Attorney's fees may be recoverable depending on jurisdiction and circumstances.

Question 6

How do I handle a negative review that I believe is false?

Accepted Answer

Respond professionally and factually without escalating the conflict—your response is visible to potential customers. Document the review and any evidence of falsity. Review the platform's terms of service for removal options; most platforms will remove reviews violating their policies (fake reviews, reviews by non-customers, hate speech). Consider whether the review contains actionable false statements of fact versus protected opinion. Pursuing legal action against reviewers raises practical challenges including identification of anonymous reviewers, litigation costs, and potential publicity. Often, the best response is generating positive reviews that marginalize the negative one. Consult counsel for significant false statements causing real harm.

Question 7

What privacy claims are available when personal information is disclosed?

Accepted Answer

Privacy law recognizes several distinct claims. Public disclosure of private facts involves publicizing true but private information that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. Intrusion upon seclusion addresses intentional intrusion into private matters. False light involves publicity placing someone in a false light that would be highly offensive. Appropriation covers unauthorized use of someone's name or likeness for commercial benefit. Additionally, various statutes protect specific information (medical records under HIPAA, financial information under GLBA, etc.). Privacy claims involve balancing privacy interests against free speech rights and newsworthiness. The viability of claims depends heavily on specific facts and applicable law.

Reputational Harm and Personal Injury

Frequently Asked Questions

Disclaimer:

Need Legal Assistance?